A surplus participant in relation to an event (or state/situation).
An Ancillary participant accompanies another participant in the context of the event. The Ancillary’s participation is presented as similar to/in accordance with—but of secondary importance to—that of the other participant.
Sometimes called comitative.
Prototypical prepositions are with, without, along_with, together_with, and together:
Could you walk with/along_with/together_with me to the store? 001
A participant may be considered surplus/secondary for just the function or also at the scene level. Ancillary is the function for adpositions like with that signal asymmetric togetherness or co-participation. More specific spatial and configurational (possession, part-whole, membership, etc.) relations take precedence at the scene level:
The girl is standing with her mother. (Locus↝Ancillary) 005
The girl is with the pigeon. (presumably, close to and interacting with it or paying special attention to it) (Locus↝Ancillary) 007
Put the fork with the knives. (Goal↝Ancillary) 008
I work with Steve. (SocialRel↝Ancillary) 009
I am with Grunnings. (Org↝Ancillary) 010
people with Grunnings (= Grunnings employees) (Org↝Ancillary) 011
Some predicates have a role of primary semantic importance expressed via a with-PP.1 In such cases, Ancillary should be the function only. However, for many predicates it may be difficult to decide whether Ancillary should also be the scene role. As a diagnostic, we test whether together_with can be used—if not, there is another role of primary importance to the scene.2
These license together-insertion:
I am admiring the paintings (together) with my friend
[we probably infer that “friend” is paired with “I”, and thus also admiring or at least viewing the paintings, but this requires pragmatics] 012
I am admiring the paintings (together) with the statues (= I am admiring the paintings, and the statues as well)
[we infer that “statues” is paired with “paintings”, and thus also being admired, but this requires pragmatics] 013
(Together) with the president, the prime minister signed the declaration
[explicit: president is together with somebody in the context of signing; inferred: president is together with the prime minister, and they probably both signed] 014
I fought (together) with her to cure cancer. (= we fought on the same side) 017
These resist together-insertion:
I’ll have to check (*together) with my supervisor. (Recipient↝Ancillary) 021
He was not ready to share a house (*together) with her. (Possessor↝Ancillary) 022
I agree (*together) with John. (= we share the same opinion) (Experiencer↝Ancillary) 023
Don’t compare me (*together) with my sister! (ComparisonRef↝Ancillary) 024
Why do people associate bats (*together) with death? (Theme↝Ancillary) 025
See further examples at Theme.
If the object denotes an item that the governor has on hand in their possession, then the construal Possession↝Ancillary is used:
This construction involves a with-PP that is coreferent with the subject. The most basic meanings of these argument structures bundle motion, possession, location, and accompaniment. In such cases, the with is analyzed as Locus↝Ancillary:3
I brought my backpack/friend with me. (Locus↝Ancillary)
[emphasizes that the backpack/friend is located with the speaker] 027
When the verb in this construction bears an extended meaning of stative or abstract accompaniment, with may be more appropriately analyzed as Ensemble↝Ancillary:
The word together, when not followed by with, can denote reciprocal accompaniment and is analyzed like with each other:
The duck and the chick are together. (Locus↝Ancillary) 029
John and Mary are together (= a couple). (SocialRel↝Ancillary) 030
Ancillary descibes a relation of an entity to an event/situation, whereas Ensemble is used for a relation directly between entities.
See also: Instrument, Manner
These can be called semantically core roles, though making a core/non-core distinction is in general problematic. ↩
For the preposition without, the test is whether together_with expresses its negation. ↩
Bring and similar verbs (take, carry, etc.) specify motion-with-possession in their most literal sense (e.g., bringing a backpack). If applying supersenses also to subjects and objects (Shalev et al., 2019; see also Originator fn. 1, Recipient fn. 1) we would use Possession/Possessor as the scene roles of the subject/object respectively. But if the object is volitional (e.g., bringing a friend), the possession is bleached away, so just Agent/Theme would apply to the subject/object. In either case, the with-PP emphasizes that the other entity is located with the bringer, so it receives Locus↝Ancillary. ↩
description | A surplus participant in relation to an event (or state/situation). |
---|---|
animacy | unspecified |
parent | Configuration |
deprecated | False |
deprecation_message | None |