Generalized notion of a part, feature/property/attribute name or value, qualitative state/condition, possession, or the contents or composition of something, understood with respect to that thing (the Gestalt).
Labels Possession, PartPortion, and its subtype Stuff, OrgMember, and QuantityValue and its subtype Approximator are defined for some important subclasses.
Characteristic applies directly to:
Adnominal: Characteristic↝Identity
Secondary predicate adjective: Characteristic↝Identity
a room with 2 beds [beds are among the things in the room] 008
Characteristic↝Stuff where the object of the preposition is construed as describing the contents in their entirety:
The PP or intransitive preposition is used (especially predicatively) to describe a qualitative state or condition of an entity that is not simply a relation of location, time, possession, quantity, causation, etc. between governor and object. For example:
With the noun state, condition, etc.:
Bodily/medical conditions presented as applying to the governor:
Miscellaneous qualitative senses of specific prepositions used statively:
John is for/against the war. [opinion] (Characteristic↝Beneficiary) 028
John is into sports. [hobbies/interests] (Characteristic↝Goal) 029
Idiomatic PPs expressing states, for example:1
Intransitive prepositions expressing a qualitative state (not location, time, etc.):
Contrast intransitive predicative prepositions describing an event:
A few observations about these state PPs are in order.
In a reversal of the usual asymmetry between governor and adpositional object, semantically, the PP defines the kind of scene that the governor participates in. To an extent, this may be true of all predicative PPs, but the state PPs are often such that the object of the preposition is neither an event nor a referential entity. I.e., John is in a hurry does not exactly express a relation between the entities John and a hurry; rather, it expresses something qualitative about the entity John’s condition.
The most idiomatic of the state PPs seem to resist questions of the form What?+NP-supercategory with a stranded preposition:
More productive prepositional usages:
Less productive/more idiomatic preposition + NP combinations:
John is in a hurry/a coma. ↛ What _ is John in?3 (Characteristic↝Locus) 035
John is on fire. ↛ What _ is John on? (Characteristic↝Locus) 036
Typically these states are binary: something is either on fire/on time, or not. For some, the negation may be expressed by substituting a contrasting preposition: an orchestra that is not in tune is out_of tune.
State PPs with complements.
The Characteristic↝Locus construal is also used when there is effectively a preposition+NP+preposition combination that links two arguments:
John is in love (withStimulus↝Topic Mary). [cf. Stimulus#012] 037
That is at odds withComparisonRef↝Topic our agreement. 038
Change-of-state PPs.
Note that Characteristic does not apply to an initial or result state, where Source and Goal are the respective scene roles (collapsing the usual state/location distinction):
The drugs put John in a coma. (Goal↝Locus) 041
They chopped the wood in pieces. (Goal↝Locus) 042
For some usages but not all, one of “Gestalt {HAS, CONTAINS} Characteristic” is entailed. This does not help to distinguish subtypes.
State PPs like at odds and on medication, which receive the construal Characteristic↝Locus, are similar to situating events like at the party and on vacation, which are analyzed as Circumstance↝Locus. What matters for the scene role is whether the object of the preposition is an event or not.
If a property pertains to an entity—whether that entity is the syntactic governor or not—then Characteristic. Manner is limited to descriptors of events.
description | Generalized notion of a part, feature/property/attribute name or value, qualitative state/condition, possession, or the contents or composition of something, understood with respect to that thing (the Gestalt). |
---|---|
animacy | unspecified |
parent | Configuration |
deprecated | False |
deprecation_message |